Month: July 2013

Thursday, 11 July 2013

08:25 – Urk. I got an order late yesterday for a full forensic science kit (FK01ABC) and emailed the buyer to say it would ship today. According to my records, we had one full FK01ABC kit in stock, along with five each of the FK01B and FK01C chemical bags. But when I went to pull the kit box and get it ready to ship, I found that the FK01A chemical bag was missing from it.

Fortunately, I have everything stacked up downstairs that I need to make up 30 FK01A chemical bags, so that’s what I’ll be doing this morning. I’ll still be able to ship that kit this afternoon.


Read the comments: 21 Comments

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

09:09 – We now have just about everything we need on hand to make up batches of 15 each of the internationalized chemistry kits and biology kits. Well, other than work space. My work tables are currently piled high with bins and bags of chemical bottles and various miscellany. I need to get those relocated to the inventory shelves before I’ll have space to build kits.

We also have just about everything we need on hand to make up 30 more forensic science kits. The only exception is Kastle-Meyer reagent, which I’ve been making up frequently in small batches. Because KM reagent is by design unstable, we seal the bottles under an inert atmosphere and refrigerate them. When we ship a forensic science kit, we pull a bottle from the refrigerator and stick it in the box just before shipping. When I made up a batch a year or so ago, I pulled one bottle and set it aside unrefrigerated and without the inert atmosphere for later testing. I think I’ll open that bottle soon and check it. If it’s still good, I may start making up larger batches of KM reagent, at least a couple months’ supply.

Come to think of it, I don’t really need to test it. All I need to do is look at it. Fresh KM reagent is a straw yellow color. Oxidized (spoiled) KM reagent turns dark reddish brown. If the liquid in that year-old bottle is still pale yellow, I’ll feel comfortable doing larger batches of KM. I want at least a one-year shelf life. If the stuff that wasn’t covered with an inert atmosphere and wasn’t refrigerated is still good, that won’t be a problem. Using the inert atmosphere and refrigerating the reagent should extend its shelf life by at least a factor of four.


14:20 – UPS just showed up with the Canon HD Camcorder. It’s charging now. Even though I knew the dimensions–2.1×2.2×4.6″ or 5.3×5.7×11.6 cm–I was still surprised how small it is. Now to figure out how to get video files off it and how to edit them. It has a USB port, so presumably it’ll be recognized as a USB mass storage device. If not, I’ll just use a card reader. It records in AVCHD or MP4. I’m not sure I have an editor that’ll work with either one, but worst case I’ll use ffmpeg to convert it to a raw format, edit it, and save it as MP4, QT, or whatever.

Read the comments: 12 Comments

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

08:45 – Well, here’s one for the books. I got an order yesterday for a biology kit. The first thing I look for in PayPal’s email is whether the shipping address is Confirmed. If so, I know I can ship the kit immediately. “Confirmed” means that PayPal has processed the credit card transaction with the card issuer and confirmed that the shipping address provided by the buyer is the same as the billing address on file with the credit card issuer. So, here’s the first part of that email. I’ve changed the name and other details, but I haven’t deleted anything.

Payment received from janedoe@yahoo.com
From: Jane Doe via PayPal <member@paypal.com>
To: “The Home Scientist, LLC”
Date: Mon Jul 8 14:15:06 2013

Hello The Home Scientist, LLC,
You received a payment of 192.00 USD from (janedoe@yahoo.com).
To see all the transaction details, please log into your PayPal account. It may take a few moments for this transaction to appear in your account.

—————————————————————-

Buyer information:
Jane Doe
janedoe@yahoo.com

Instructions from buyer:
None provided

Ship-to address: – Confirmed
Jane Doe
P.O. Box
Seattle, WA 99999
United States

….

I immediately emailed the buyer, of course, to ask what her PO Box number was, but I still haven’t heard back from her. Then I thought I’d better check with PayPal, so I called tech support. When the guy asked what the problem was, I told him that they’d provided “P.O. Box” alone as a “Confirmed” ship-to address. When he saw what I was talking about, he started laughing and said, “Better not ship that one.” He eventually speculated that PayPal had run the transaction through the credit card issuer, who for some reason approved “P.O. Box” with no number as the actual billing address for that card. Like me, he figured that the woman who placed the order just got distracted and forgot to enter the actual box number, but given the amount involved he suggested that I refund that payment and tell the buyer to submit a new order with a proper address. So that’s what I did.


Read the comments: 15 Comments

Monday, 8 July 2013

07:41 – Costco run and dinner with Mary and Paul yesterday. I asked Paul about the lab skills of incoming freshmen chemistry students, and he said that with very few exceptions they pretty much didn’t have any. Many of them are very bright kids. They easily grasp the theory, but they’ve never had any hands-on lab work to speak of so they’re clueless about how to do even simple procedures. Paul mentioned one first lab class where they were doing simple procedures that he said either of us would have finished in half an hour. Hours later, the kids were still struggling and nowhere near finished. He finally just told them to go home. Paul particularly remembered one boy, who was extremely bright but had no practical experience. Paul was horrified to find the boy weighing out a chemical by transferring it directly to the pan of the scale rather than using a weigh paper or boat. He asked the boy how he planned to get the chemical off the scale. Presumably by inverting the scale to dump the chemical.

When I was doing high-school and undergrad chemistry, we spent much, much more time in lab than kids do nowadays. That’s probably a result of both costs and concerns about safety. Many public schools nowadays have limited or no lab facilities and the cost of materials is a big hurdle for most of them. A year-long highschool chemistry course in many public schools provides little or no actual hands-on lab work. Students watch demonstrations. If they’re lucky, it’s the teacher doing an actual demonstration, but increasingly it’s demonstration videos. As I’ve said, that’s kind of like trying to learn to drive a car by watching a video of someone else doing it.

Homeschoolers generally do better, but still devote too little time to hands-on lab work. A typical homeschool chemistry course may devote one day every two weeks to lab work. When one of them asks me, I recommend that they average spending 40% to 50% of their time on lab work, call it two sessions or more a week. And I also recommend that they reverse the usual prioritization. Instead of making textbook lecture first priority and filling in any remaining time with lab work, devote as much time as necessary to getting through all the labs and then use whatever time is left over for lectures. Their kids will be better prepared for college science. They’ll hit the ground running.

Yesterday and overnight, we had almost 3 inches (7.5 cm) of rain. Another month’s worth of rain in one day. Things are getting a bit soggy around here.


11:25 – I’m filling some containers with chemicals that are hazardous or obnoxious, or both. These are ones that I won’t let Barbara deal with. I just finished a batch of thirty 25 g bottles of sodium dithionite. It’s hazardous because it’s a spontaneously flammable solid, and it’s obnoxious because it reeks to high heaven. The odor isn’t intense or immediately obvious, but it’s persistent and it smells like something died.

Next up is filling a bunch of polypropylene RIA vials with 500 mg each of crystal iodine. It’s nasty stuff, a strong corrosive. It’s not as bad as bromine, which in turn isn’t as bad as fluorine, but it’s still pretty bad. Not something I want to get on my skin, so I’ll wear nitrile gloves. Which should tell you something, because I usually don’t wear gloves to handle the big three concentrated mineral acids–hydrochloric, sulfuric, and nitric. But iodine is corrosive enough that I won’t take chances with it. Put it this way: one time I was weighing out iodine to make up iodine-iodide solution and made the mistake of using a chrome-plated steel spatula. As I transferred the iodine crystals from the spatula to the weigh boat, I noticed that the spatula was no longer chrome-plated where the iodine had contacted it.

After that, I’ll fill a bunch of polypropylene RIA vials with 500 mg each of ninhydrin, which isn’t particularly hazardous but is another of the chemicals I won’t let Barbara handle. Ninhydrin is used to visualize latent fingerprints. It reacts with skin oils to form an intense purple dye. Which means it also stains skin an intense purple color, which stains aren’t easily delible.

Read the comments: 57 Comments

Sunday, 7 July 2013

10:16 – One of the items on my to-do list was to buy an HD camcorder to use in shooting more of the science videos I used to post on YouTube. One must-have feature was a microphone input, which is surprisingly rare on consumer-grade camcorders. I can’t stand the audio from on-camera microphones, so I’ll always use either a shotgun or a wireless lavaliere. Doing that requires a mic input.

So yesterday I got a promo email from Costco that featured a Canon HF R400 HD Camcorder Bundle (with case and 16 GB memory card) for $290 after a $70 rebate. Today is the last day of the promo. I checked Amazon, and their price was higher for the bare camcorder. I checked Canon, and the HF R400 HD camcorder does have a microphone input. So I just ordered the camcorder bundle from Costco. Imagine my surprise when I added it to my cart and found out that the price wasn’t $290 after the $70 rebate. It was $290 before the $70 rebate. So I ended up paying $220 plus tax, with free shipping.


Read the comments: 7 Comments

Saturday, 6 July 2013

10:43 – We’ve had rain or a high likelihood of rain nearly every day for more than a month. Our total for June was over 11 inches (28 cm), which is three times normal. Even on days that there’s no measurable rainfall, the dew has been so heavy that the grass often doesn’t dry out until afternoon. There was a slight sprinkle this morning, but the sun is out now, so Barbara is grabbing the opportunity to get some yard work done. I’m doing laundry and my other typical Saturday chores, as well as continuing work on internationalizing the biology and chemistry kits.

I’ve already made up most of the substitute chemicals. All that remain are the 9.99% acetic acid, the 9.99% ammonia, and the 0.99% hydrochloric acid. There’s no danger of confusing either of the two acids with the more concentrated versions used in the US kits. The 6M acetic acid in the US kits is more than three times as concentrated as the 10% version for the international kits. The 6 M acetic acid has fumes that’ll knock your socks off; the 10% acetic acid smells like strong vinegar. The fumes from the 6 M hydrochloric acid in the US kits really strong; the fumes from the 1% hydrochloric acid are almost unnoticeable. The ammonia solutions do present a risk of confusion, because the 10% ammonia for the international kits is only slightly less concentrated than the 6 M ammonia used in the US kits. It’s impossible to discriminate the two by appearance or odor; both are water clear and have strong fumes. So I’m going to add a tiny amount of blue dye to the 10% ammonia for the international kits, just enough to make the solution noticeably bluish. Or I may do it the other way. Yeah, actually that makes more sense. The higher concentration has something more than the lower.

Thanks to everyone who commented or sent me email about international shipping with DHL, FedEx, or UPS. I ruled out all of those long ago. If the postal service can’t get it somewhere, I just won’t sell kits there. A year or so ago, when we first started shipping kits to Canada, I checked into using DHL, FedEx, or UPS. I called the 800 numbers for each of them and asked what should have been a simple question: “I have a box with the following dimensions and mass that contains the following items. How much will you charge me to ship it to a specific Canadian address?” None of the three could give me a specific dollar amount. There were so many potential added fees, many of which were variable and applied only under certain circumstances, that I couldn’t get even a ballpark number for what it would cost me to ship. For example, one of them (UPS I think) charges according to the distance that the recipient is from the local UPS office. Beyond x miles, a surcharge applies; beyond 2x miles, a higher surcharge applies. Another surcharge applies to residential versus business addresses, and a redelivery charge applies if the driver isn’t able to deliver the package on the first attempt. There were something like (and I am not making this up) 80 different types of surcharges. The customer service rep actually had the nerve to suggest that I open an account with them. She said that my account would be billed for the nominal charge until the package was delivered, after which my account might be billed additional surcharges retroactively. Jesus. Who could run a business that way? “Hire me to provide a service. After I’ve provided it, I’ll tell you how much you owe me.” So, yeah, I’m sticking with USPS Priority Mail for US shipments and USPS Priority Mail International for foreign shipments.


Read the comments: 19 Comments

Friday, 5 July 2013

11:22 – Colin had a pretty bad evening. He’s only two years old, but he’s already terrified of fireworks. Someone in the neighborhood was setting off heavy stuff. Not just little bottle rockets and firecrackers, but serious rockets with heavy bursting charges, and in large numbers. Hell, they may even have been using a pyrotechnic mortar. Colin jumped every time one of the heavy ones detonated. I’m guessing that whoever was doing it probably burned at least $1,000 worth of fireworks.

I’m working today on internationalizing the biology and chemistry kits, which involves changes to a few of the chemicals in each. In many cases, we can comply with international hazardous materials shipping regulations simply by decreasing the concentration and increasing the amount. For example, the standard biology and chemistry kits include 15 mL of 6 M ammonia, which is hazardous according to IATA. So we’re going to substitute 30 mL of 4 M ammonia in the international kits, which makes it perfectly legal to ship.

For one or two chemicals, the change is more radical. For example, we ship 30 mL of 6 M (~ 20%) hydrochloric acid in our US kits. The maximum concentration allowable under IATA regulations is < 1%, or about 0.3 M. So we'll ship 100 mL of that, which is enough to get most of the labs done. The really annoying thing is the IATA rules on sodium (or potassium) hydroxide, for which they have zero tolerance. Shipping even one mL of 0.001% hydroxide solution violates their regulations. Fortunately, in most countries it's pretty easy to get ahold of solid sodium hydroxide, which is sold in hardware stores, DIY centers, and so on as "lye" or "crystal drain opener". So for hydroxide we have no option but to tell international buyers they'll have to get it locally.

The rest of the changes are pretty minor. For example, in our US kits we ship 15 mL of Sudan III stain solution, which is a tiny amount of the solid stain dissolved in isopropanol (rubbing alcohol). The only way to ship IPA legally under IATA regulation is at a concentration much too low to dissolve the stain powder. So we’ll ship a bottle that has only about 6 mg of the solid stain in it. International buyers will have to fill the bottle with 15 mL of rubbing alcohol and let the stain dissolve.

We’ll ship international kits via USPS Priority Mail International in boxes we provide, rather than using USPS-provided boxes. Although the boxes cost us a buck or so each, the postage will be at least a few dollars less than it would be if we used a USPS Large Flat-Rate Box.

Other than the chemical differences, the main difference for international buyers will be that they’ll have to pay postage. We won’t know exactly how much until we can get a weight for the international kits, but for the biology kits I’d guess we’re probably talking a postage surcharge of maybe $40 to Canada, $50 to Mexico, and $60 to the UK and most of the rest of Europe. Of course, depending on country, they may also have to pay import duties, VAT, or other fees to the postal carrier when the box is delivered.

The other difference is that for international sales we have no option but to ship FOB Winston-Salem, NC USA. In effect, that means our responsibility ends when we hand the package to the USPS carrier. All risk of loss or damage is assumed by the buyer. We may offer insurance at an additional cost, but it isn’t cheap and it may take literally months to settle a claim for loss or damage, assuming it’s settled at all.


17:25 – I just made up a liter of 0.5 M dipotassium oxalate solution for the international chemistry kits. Which of course gave me a good question for the AP chemistry course I’ll eventually write…

When I was in high school, all of the seniors took the Kuder test. It was intended to come up with recommendations for the careers we were best-suited to pursue. My top three recommendations were, IIRC, research scientist, university chemistry professor, and high-school science teacher. I suspect if I’d been a high school or university science teacher my students would have feared and loathed me.

So, here’s the question I came up with: “You dissolve 56.1056 grams of potassium hydroxide (FW 56.1056 g/mol) in 1000.0 mL of 0.5000 M oxalic acid to make a solution of dipotassium oxalate. To four decimal places, what is the molarity of that solution? If you have insufficient data to answer the question, specify what additional datum or data you need.”

Heh, heh, heh. I remind me of my ungrad p-chem professor. Each test day, he wore his test t-shirt, which had an image of an erect middle finger on the front.

Read the comments: 29 Comments

Thursday, 4 July 2013

Happy Birthday USA!

As you celebrate Independence Day today, please take a moment to think about the men and women of our armed forces, past and present, who have willingly risked, and all too often lost, everything to defend our freedom. I worry about America, but there can be nothing very wrong with a country that continues to produce men and women like them.


13:21 – I got email this morning from a woman in Hong Kong who wanted to order a science kit or kits.

Will you be offering any of your science kits for sale to international customers at some point?

I am keen to teach my son some science at home, as he is a science buff but I don’t feel that his school is doing enough, especially in terms of lab work. I would hate for him to lose his interest because of this, hence my desire to bolster his studies with some home science.

Fyi, we are based in Hong Kong. If you cannot ship overseas and have no intention of doing so anytime soon, are you able to ship to Canada, as we have family there.

Regards,

Melissa

I typically get a couple of similar requests every week, and sometimes a couple a day. I really, really hate saying no to these folks, despite the fact that it’s a major hassle to ship kits outside the US and with the additional time and effort required we probably barely break even, if that. But I hate turning down these folks. I’d been seriously considering re-starting international shipments, so I replied:

Hi, Melissa

We recently discontinued shipping our science kits outside the US, mainly because international hazardous shipping regulations made it extremely costly to do so, but also because of the paperwork hassles. We even had to discontinue sales to APO/FPO (US military families) addresses for the same reasons.

We’re currently in the process of designing versions of our chemistry and biology kits that are legal for international shipping. There are some downsides to this.

o In order to make the kits legal for international shipping, we’ve had to remove several chemicals that are defined as hazardous for international shipping purposes. I’m attaching two PDF files that describe the differences. They refer to Canada, but in fact the same restrictions apply to shipments to any destination outside the US. In most cases we either supply a substitute chemical that is legal to ship, or recommend a locally-available replacement.

o You are responsible for determining whether it is legal for you to have a kit shipped to you. There are so many international jurisdictions that it’s impossible for us to do so. In practice, in the past many buyers have probably ignored this issue, and we’ve never had any problems with any of the many kits we’ve shipped internationally.

o Shipping costs are high to very high, depending on where the kit is being shipped. For example, shipping a kit to Canada may cost $40 or more in addition to the price of the kit itself. I just checked, and shipping a kit to Hong Kong would cost $60 or more additional. These figures do not include the additional costs listed below. On the plus side, if you want both kits or two of the same kit, the total shipping cost is usually considerably less than twice the shipping cost for a single kit.

o You may or may not incur additional fees, taxes, customs duties, VAT, and so on. So far, none of our international kit buyers have been charged such costs, but we’ve shipped only to Canada.

o Delivery times can be long. In the US, our kits generally arrive within 1 to 3 business days. For shipments to Canada and most other international destinations, 6 to 10 business days is common, and it may take longer. Also, although we normally ship kits to US addresses within one business day, shipments of kits to international addresses may require from three to ten days lead time. (We have to build these kits individually.)

o Because we have no control over or ability to track or follow-up on international shipments, all kits shipped to addresses outside the US are FOB Winston-Salem, NC, USA. In effect, that means our responsibility ends when we hand the package to the US Postal Service carrier. (You can purchase insurance, but in our experience it’s a waste of money. Although we’ve never had a kit we shipped internationally lost or damaged, we’ve been told that insurance on international shipments almost never actually pays if there’s a loss.)

If despite all these limitations you still want to order a kit or kits, please let me know. I’ll give you an estimate for shipping time and costs.

Best regards.

Bob


Robert Bruce Thompson
thompson@thehomescientist.com

Read the comments: 21 Comments

Wednesday, 3 July 2013

08:06 – The religious nutters social conservatives in the North Carolina Senate have passed yet another bill that attempts to do an end-run around Roe v. Wade and numerous other court decisions that have confirmed a woman’s right to have an abortion. Their intention is to render that right meaningless by making it impossible for a woman to find a medical facility that performs abortions. The NC House is almost certain to cooperate with the Senate in passing a law that puts severe new restrictions on abortion. Fortunately, our governor, also a Republican, has already said that he won’t accept any further restrictions on abortion, so presumably he’ll veto whatever bill eventually passes.

With numerous states passing laws that infringe on their citizens’ rights, perhaps we need a new amendment to the US Constitution that mandates that anything that is legally permissible for citizens in one state is also legally permissible for citizens in all other states. So, for example, the fact that Vermont puts zero restrictions on its citizens’ rights to keep and bear arms would mean that no other state could do so. Same deal on legalizing marijuana for medical or personal use. I like that idea. We could call it the Freedom Amendment.


09:04 – I just filled a batch of bottles of Herzberg’s Stain for the forensic science kits. The automated dispenser worked fine, although I had my doubts. The stain is rather viscous. It’s based on iodine in a saturated solution of zinc chloride. Zinc chloride is extremely soluble in water, so much so that a saturated solution at room temperature is about 85% zinc chloride and 15% water by mass. In other words, water is the solute and solid zinc chloride is the solvent. The solution is very dense. When I picked up a one-liter soda bottle with only about 200 mL of stain in it, it felt like a full bottle of water. Next up is a batch of bottles of Jenk’s Stain, which is similar to Herzberg’s but is based on a saturated solution of magnesium chloride rather than zinc chloride.


14:16 – Steve and Heather, our neighbors across the street and down two houses, are moving this week. The bank foreclosed and the house goes to auction next week. Steve shouted to me yesterday and asked if I had any interest in a big bookshelf they planned to get rid of. He thought I might want it for holding kit stuff. I went in to look at it and it was indeed big: 12’3″ (3.7+ meters) wide, 10″ (25 cm) deep, and 6’4″ (1.9+ meters) tall. There’s a total of about 78 linear feet (~ 24 meters) of shelf space. It’s solid wood. I’m guessing pine, but it’s heavy enough that it might even be oak. Barbara went over to look at it last night and said she thought it’d be good in the basement for storing kit stuff. (We have several hundred SKUs, many of which are stored in shoe-box size plastic bins on shelves.) So I went over today with a tape measure and several bins to check its suitability. Bins fit the shelves two-high, which means I can fit 200+ bins on the shelf unit.

I’d planned to go down to Home Depot this week and buy a couple of these $99 units, which provide about 20 feet each of double-wide shelving. Call it 40 feet each, which means it’d take two of them to hold as many bins as the shelves I got from Steve. When I asked Steve how much I could pay him for the unit, he said he’d been thinking $200. That sounded fair, so that’s what I paid him.

Steve, his son, and his future son-in-law hauled it over to our house and put it in the basement for me. I called Barbara to let her know to be careful when she pulled in the garage because the new bookshelf was sitting between where she parks her car and where I park my 4×4. She asked how I’d gotten it over here, so of course I told her I’d just picked it up and carried it over. Didn’t fool her for a minute.


14:52 – I see that Illinois governor Pat Quinn–a Democrat, of course–is attempting to gut a concealed carry law, despite opposition from his own party. He’s doing the same thing abortion opponents do: if a law permits something you don’t like, just make the law meaningless by placing restrictions on it that effective destroy the intent of the law. Abortion opponents attempt to make a woman’s right to an abortion meaningless by making it impossible to get one. Anti-gun people attempt to make concealed carry laws ineffective by placing restrictions on where a permit holder can carry, which is what Quinn is doing now. He wants to forbid permit holders from carrying anywhere alcohol is served. So, it’s legal for them to carry before they arrive at a bar, illegal to carry while they’re in the bar, and then legal for them to carry after they leave the bar. What are they supposed to do? Check their guns at the door? Concealed carry permits need to be effective anywhere. If you have a permit (which you shouldn’t even need to carry a weapon, or so says the US Constitution), you’re allowed to carry anywhere that you are legally entitled to be. That includes place like federal courthouses, airliners, and so on.

But Quinn isn’t satisfied with just that. No, he also wants to restrict permit holders to carrying one weapon and one magazine with at most ten rounds of ammunition. Now, I have no objection to reasonable limits. If he’d limited permit holders to carrying, say, 100 weapons on their persons, and no more than 1,000 magazines, each with no more than 100 rounds, I’d have had no problem with that. But I think it’d be better to just allow permit holders to decide what and how much they wanted to carry. I suspect all of them would have been reasonable. For example, even back in the days when I sometimes went heavily armed, I seldom carried more than three concealed weapons–a .45 Colt Combat Commander, a .45 Star PD, and a .45 MAC-10 submachine gun, with only two 7-round magazines each for the pistols and half a dozen 30-round mags for the SMG.

Read the comments: 46 Comments

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

08:09 – I see the interest rate on subsidized federal student loans doubled yesterday, from 3.4% to 6.8%, bringing them in line with the rates charged on non-subsidized loans since 2007. Yet another failed federal program. As usual, it started with the best of intentions–making sure that qualified students could afford to attend college–and, also as usual, it quickly degenerated into a hopeless, expensive mess. The worst effect of this student-loan mess is never mentioned: it’s hugely increased the cost of a college education for everyone, including those of us who pay for it themselves.

One of the fundamental laws of economics is that when you subsidize something you get more of it. And, boy, have we gotten more college graduates out of this deal. The problem is, most of them aren’t qualified to do anything more than counter work at McDonalds or Starbucks, jobs that obviously don’t require a college education in the first place. These kids could have saved themselves a lot of time, money, and heartache by skipping college and going straight to work in the dead-end jobs that are all they’re qualified for anyway. And they wouldn’t have had tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt to pay off.

The solution to this problem is easy, and should have been obvious all along. No taxpayer tuition subsidies and no federally-guaranteed student loans for students who choose to major in non-rigorous subjects. If you want to major in science or accounting or medicine or engineering or nursing or agriculture, fine. The taxpayers have an interest in maintaining an adequate supply of people qualified in these fields. If you want to major in English literature or sociology or European history or women’s studies, fine. Pay your own way. Don’t expect the taxpayers to pay for your four-year vacation, either directly via taxes that support state universities or indirectly by taxes that support federally-guaranteed student loans.


Read the comments: 52 Comments
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- // end of file archive.php // -------------------------------------------------------------------------------