Category: science kits

Friday, 20 July 2012

09:44 – Another mass shooting in Colorado, just down the road from where the Columbine shootings occurred in 1999. News reports differ, with some reporting 12 dead and others 14. All agree that there are many wounded. Apparently, no one in the theater audience was armed, or at least there are no reports of anyone in the audience returning fire. As is too often the case, the shooter was unharmed.


The sudden flurry in kit orders we experienced recently almost certainly resulted from a mention in MAKE Magazine. I couldn’t figure out why things had suddenly heated up, because now should be a dead time. People are on vacation, not thinking about buying homeschooling materials. So now we’re back to normal, with two or three kit orders some days and none or one other days. That’s the level I expected for this time of year. Orders should start coming in faster in August, particularly from mid-August onward through September and into October. Meanwhile, we’re building inventory.


12:15 – Periodically, I need to take a break from doing kit stuff. I don’t normally eat lunch, so I sometimes go back and stretch out on the bed to read or take a short nap. Other times, I’ll go watch/re-watch something on Netflix streaming that Barbara either doesn’t want to watch or doesn’t want to watch again.

Speaking of which, we should finish up series two of Lying Little Pretties tonight. That series is very highly rated, both on Netflix and IMDB, but don’t believe it. The cast is good, but the writing isn’t. In fact, it’s terrible. There are plot holes you could drive a truck through. Hell, a supertanker. At first, it seems that the main characters are simply stupid, but it goes further than that. Even stupid people don’t do the kinds of things the writers have their main characters doing. It’s kind of like those old horror movies where the woman who’s being stalked by an axe murderer (and knows it) hears a sound in the basement. So she goes to the basement door. The light switch doesn’t work. So she goes down the stairs into the dark basement. Even that woman wouldn’t be stupid enough to do the things the main characters do in this series.

For example, one of the characters is a high-school teacher who’s carrying on a sexual affair with one of the main characters, who’s a 15-year-old student when the affair begins. Okay, fine. It happens. A minor character, a friend of the teacher, even warns him at one point that he’s cruising for “a pink slip and an orange jumpsuit”. So, what do this teacher and his pretty little girlfriend decide to do? They sit down with her parents, who are also teachers, and tell them what they’re doing. Geez. And the teacher is one of the *smarter* characters in this series.

Read the comments: 35 Comments

Wednesday, 18 July 2012

08:16 – I finished the review of the QC2 pass of Illustrated Guide to Home Forensic Science Experiments and returned it to my editor. That means we’re finished with the book and it’ll be off to the printer soon.

That also means we need to get started building forensic kits. We just finished a batch of 30 chemistry kits and started another batch of 60. We have a new batch of 30 biology kits in progress, so I’ll slot in a batch of 30 forensics kits to follow the biology kits. Lots of balls in the air…


13:42 – I’ve spent the morning working on biology kits. We now have all the components and subassemblies for a new batch of 30 biology kits ready to go, needing only final assembly and packing.

Read the comments: 1 Comments

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

08:08 – Our editor sent us the QC2 galley proof yesterday, so I’ve been reading through it and making final corrections. I’ll probably finish that today, or maybe tomorrow. At that point, the book goes to the printer, and should be in the bookstores within a month or so.

Meanwhile, our stock of biology kits is starting to dwindle. We have enough to carry us for the next couple of weeks at the current sales rate, so I plan to get another 30 biology kits assembled and ready to ship over the coming week or so. We’re in reasonably good shape on chemistry kits, with a decent number in stock and another 60 kits a-building.


13:11 – As always, I’m enjoying going through the QC PDF. I really enjoy writing about and reading about forensic science. Also, as always, for some reason I’m surprised as I read to discover that this guy sounds like he really knows what he’s talking about.

And I think about stuff that for now remains in the realm of science fiction. For example, right now I’m reading the group of lab sessions on fingerprinting. I’m thinking about how often a questioned fingerprint is useless in the absence of a suspect because that print is not on file, and I think to myself that there’s no reason that we shouldn’t be able to reverse-engineer a fingerprint into the nuclear DNA fragment that caused that fingerprint to be expressed. Similarly, given a questioned nuclear DNA specimen for which no match is on file, there’s no reason we shouldn’t be able to use that DNA to construct the fingerprints of the person it belongs to. Every loop, every bifurcation and whirl, every pore, is programmed into that DNA. We just don’t know enough, yet, to reverse-engineer fingerprints to nDNA fragments or nDNA to fingerprint patterns. But I have no doubt that we’ll do it eventually. I’ve seen nothing in the literature about this idea, but it’d make an interesting project.

Read the comments: 60 Comments

Sunday, 15 July 2012

08:31 – We were running low on chemistry kits, so this weekend we’re doing final assembly on a batch of two dozen more, along with making up subassemblies for yet another five dozen. Barbara also made up a bunch of biology kit small parts bags, which is the last subassembly we needed to assemble another batch of biology kits.


Read the comments: 60 Comments

Saturday, 14 July 2012

09:32 – It’s the usual Saturday around here. I’m doing laundry and Barbara is doing household chores. Later, we’ll do kit stuff.

The chemistry kit Bill Grigg ordered on Thursday, 5 July arrived at his home yesterday. He wasn’t there to answer the door when the mailman showed up, so the kit is sitting at his local post office awaiting pickup. I’m very relieved that it made it there. I’ll be even more relieved once Bill picks it up and verifies that a grizzly bear didn’t step on it. Also, I have to admit that the Canada Post updates are making me a bit nervous. It sounds like they’re really anxious to have him pick it up. I hope they don’t send it back to me.

Shipment Activity Location Date & Time
——————————————————————————–
Attempted Delivery – CANADA 07/13/12 6:19pm
Item being held, addressee being notified

Attempted Delivery – CANADA 07/13/12 4:34pm
Item being held, addressee being notified

Attempted Delivery – CANADA 07/13/12 3:50pm
Item being held, addressee being notified

Addressee not CANADA 07/13/12 9:06am
available – Addressee advised to pick up the item


Read the comments: 20 Comments

Friday, 13 July 2012

10:03 – Another lab day today. As usual, I’ve saved the most obnoxious solutions for last. Stuff like concentrated acetic acid, ammonia, hydrochloric acid, and so on. Very concentrated solutions of some chemicals are called “fuming”, as in “fuming nitric acid” or “fuming sulfuric acid”. No one talks about “fuming acetic acid” or “fuming ammonia” or “fuming hydrochloric acid” because the usual concentrations already emit noxious fumes, and those fumes are sufficient to knock your socks off. That’s one major reason I decided to include 6 M solutions of those chemicals in the kits. It would actually have been easier to provide standard concentrated versions–17 M acetic acid, 15 M ammonia, and 12 M hydrochloric acid–but the 6 M solutions are usable for our purposes and the fumes are a lot less obnoxious.

I also need to start getting solutions prepared for the forensics kits. Several of those are hazardous–three or four are basically concentrated sulfuric acid with minor additions–but at least none of them are particularly obnoxious in terms of fumes.


14:05 – I just made something I didn’t know existed: iodine syrup. I was making up three liters of IKI (iodine/potassium iodide) solution that’s 0.1 molar with respect to both iodine and iodide. That meant I needed 38.07 g of iodine and 49.80 g of potassium iodide.

Now, the thing is, iodine is almost insoluble in water. But in the presence of equimolar or more iodide ions, each iodine molecule bonds with an iodide ion to form a triiodide ion, which is extremely soluble in water. But the speed of dissolution depends on the concentration of the iodide ion. If I’d simply dissolved that 49.80 g of potassium iodide in about three liters of water, added the 38.07 g of iodine, and made up the solution to three liters, the iodine would have dissolved. Eventually. It might have taken literally a month to dissolve, but it would have dissolved.

But iodine dissolves very quickly in a concentrated iodide solution, the more concentrated, the better. Potassium iodide is extremely soluble. At room temperature, that 49.80 g of potassium iodide will dissolve in about 36 mL of water. So I weighed out 49.80 g of potassium iodide in a glass 250 mL beaker, added just enough DI water to dissolve the salt, and then added 38.07 g of iodine. As far as I could tell, the iodine crystals dissolved instantly. I say as far as I could tell, because the liquid in the beaker instantly turned an opaque black, so opaque that I couldn’t see any light through the liquid even holding the beaker up against an overhead fluorescent tube and looking through the bottom of the beaker and a couple centimeters of liquid.

If there’d still been iodine crystals in the bottom of the beaker, I wouldn’t have been able to tell. I tried tilting the beaker back and forth to see if any crystals were visible on the bottom of the beaker, but there weren’t. Still, on general principles, I kept swirling the beaker for a few seconds every minute for ten minutes or so. That’s how I discovered that there is such a thing as iodine syrup. The stuff was viscous, kind of like vegetable oil. Not surprising, I guess, with almost 90 g of solids dissolved in maybe 50 mL of water.

Finally, I decided to give it go, so I carefully poured the liquid into a 1 L volumetric flask, which was the largest I have. I was kind of expecting iodine crystals to reveal themselves in the bottom of the beaker, but there weren’t any. So I made up the solution to 1.0 L and transferred it to the storage container, adding two more 1 L flasks’ worth of water. My volumetric flasks are calibrated to-contain rather than to-deliver, but I know from previous tests that the flasks actually deliver about 999+ mL. So I added just enough water to the storage container to make it up to exactly 3.0 L, give or take a mL.

Read the comments: 24 Comments

Thursday, 12 July 2012

08:18 – Yesterday, I unplugged the Roku box and left it unplugged for an hour or two. When I powered it back up, the problem seemed to have resolved itself. We watched a couple of streaming episodes last nigh with no apparent problems.

Speaking of television, Barbara and I saw in the paper that our local NBC affiliate, WXII, is no longer on Time-Warner Cable as a result of a money dispute. We hadn’t even noticed. TWC replaced the WXII feed with a feed from an NBC affiliate in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, so no one would miss NBC network feeds. It still strikes me as bizarre that local TV affiliates can charge cable systems to carry their signal. That charge is of course passed on to cable subscribers in their bills, so they are being charged for something that they could watch over-the-air for free. It seems to me that the local affiliates benefit hugely from being on the cable systems; their ad revenues must be many times what they would be if only their OTA viewership was counted. So I think the cable systems should take a hard line: tell the local affiliate that the cable system won’t pay them a cent for carrying their signals, and if the local affiliates don’t like it, the cable system won’t carry their signals at all.

In reality, as I’ve said many times before, local network affiliates are an obsolete holdover from the days when networks needed local affiliates to put their signals on the air. With cable and satellite universally available, there’s no longer any need for local affiliates. The networks should simply provide their signals to the cable and satellite systems. The huge benefit to eliminating local affiliates is that it would free up a massive amount of RF spectrum that could be used for cell phones, wireless data, and so on. And, as I’ve also said repeatedly, the networks themselves are also obsolete. They’re middlemen, and the Internet has eliminated the need for them.


I’ve allocated today to making up solutions and filling bottles and doing some label redesign.

Read the comments: 4 Comments

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

10:42 – We’ve been screwed again by Roku. After we ran the Ethernet cable from the den to the router, everything worked fine. No delays, very good picture quality, and no drop-outs for re-buffering. Then, yesterday, I fired up the Roku box to watch some Netflix streaming. Roh-roh. The first indication of a problem was the time needed to buffer. Ordinarily, I see the buffering bar for maybe 10 or 15 seconds, and then the program starts playing in HD. This time, it took literally two or three minutes to buffer. I then got about three seconds of HD before it dropped the signal and started re-buffering. This time, it took three or four minutes to buffer, and the video quality was showing two balls rather than the usual four balls + HD. The program then ran for about two minutes before it blew up again and started re-buffering.

My first thought was that we might be having network problems with TWC, so I went to my office and ran some network tests. Our download speed was between 13 and 14 Mbps (HD streaming takes only 5 Mbps), and the latency looked fine. So I figured Netflix might be having problems and called their tech support. The guy told me there were no problems on their end, and then said, “Oh, wait a minute. You’re using a Roku box.” As it turns out, Roku pushed down a firmware upgrade earlier that day, and the Netflix support guy said it had “buried” them. He said there were two things that would solve the problem. He suggested first powering down the Roku box and our router, waiting a minute, and powering up the router and then the Roku box. If that didn’t work, he said to deactivate the Roku box and then reactivate it. He said that would solve the problem.

I did the power-down thing. No joy. It was still taking three minutes to buffer and then dropping the signal. So I took a deep breath and started the de-activate/reactivate procedure. (When I first set up the Roku box, that “five-minute” job took four hours, much of which was spent on the phone with Roku tech support, who speak only extremely Chinese-accented English.) I de-activated Netflix, did a factory reset on the Roku, and went through the procedure to re-activate. This time, it indeed took only a few minutes. But… No joy. Three minutes of buffering, followed by 2-ball video quality and frequent drops.

So I called Netflix tech support again, and told the woman who answered what I’d done. She said that one or the other of the things I’d done should have solved the problem, but said they did have a list of four or five other things I could try. She emailed that to me, and all of them had to do with wireless problems. So at this point I’m stuck. Netflix doesn’t know what else to tell me, and suggests the problem must be with my broadband connection. I’ve tested that, and it’s fine. It would be an amazing coincidence if this problem, which started when Roku pushed their damned firmware upgrade, wasn’t related to that upgrade. But there’s no way I’m going to call Roku tech support, which is as abominable as any tech support operation I’ve ever spoken to.


Talk about just-in-time inventory. UPS showed up late yesterday afternoon with a bunch of boxes from one of my wholesalers. Among them somewhere is a crate of 144 250 mL beakers, which is all I lacked to make up the batch of 30 chemistry kits that’s sitting waiting for beakers, as well as the new batch of 60 that’s currently in progress. And we’d better start thinking about making up more biology kits, too. We have less than 20 finished biology kits in stock and components to assemble 30 more. Sometime in the next few days, I’ll run 60 sets of labels for the biology kits and get Barbara started on labeling bottles.

Read the comments: 22 Comments

Monday, 9 July 2012

12:07 – My life has become a steady stream of building science kits, processing orders for them, and shipping them. Not that I’m complaining. I wish it could be like this all year long. Instead, it’s semi-crazy in July, full-on crazy in August and September, and back to semi-crazy in October. Still, as long as we can continue to build enough kits to meet demand, and assuming the current sales trajectory holds up, it looks like we’ll reach my goal for the year in September, if not August. The remainder of the year should allow us to exceed the goal comfortably.

And to think that back around April/May, I was seriously considering starting another book in the DIY science series and designing another kit. As it is, I’ll be hard pressed to get the first batch of forensic science kits ready by the time the book hits the bookstores in about a month. I haven’t even started making up the solutions, of which there are a large number, other than in prototype quantities. As a very smart friend of mine once commented, “We can do anything, but we can’t do everything.”


Read the comments: 17 Comments

Sunday, 8 July 2012

08:55 – It’s still early July, and the rate of kit orders is starting to scare me. We’re already shipping them faster than we can build new ones, and the rate of orders is accelerating. We’ve had four kit orders so far today, and it’s not even 9:00 a.m. From everything I’ve been told, the order rate in August and September is likely to be at least three or four times what it is now.

I remember laughing to myself when I read the USPS page about scheduling pickups. It said they didn’t need an exact package count, but they needed to get some idea so they’d know whether or not they needed to send out a separate truck. At this point, that may not turn out to be funny. Those 30 chemistry kits in final assembly and 60 more chemistry kit currently a-building may not last long. I was planning to do 30 more biology kits next, but we may do 60 more instead. And we’re down to less than 200 shipping boxes, so I need to re-order those from USPS.


Read the comments: 23 Comments
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- // end of file archive.php // -------------------------------------------------------------------------------