Biology book

By on July 12th, 2011 in biology, writing

I’m still working heads-down on the biology book. I wasn’t happy with the original structure, so I’m reorganizing it and moving stuff around, rewriting some stuff, and writing new stuff.

It’s times like this that I really envy fiction writers. They don’t have to work within the constraints that we non-fiction writers do. They can just make stuff up, and as long as it’s believable that’s all that matters. If a book runs too long, they can just cut stuff out; if it runs too short, they can just add some scenes. We non-fiction writers have to get everything right, and we have to fit everything in that belongs there.

I remember years ago at a mystery conference sitting down with Peter Robinson. When I told him that I wrote non-fiction, he said he could never do that because it would be too hard to get everything right. I told him that I’d never written fiction, but I thought it would be more difficult than writing fiction. Nowadays, I’m coming around to his point of view.

4 Comments and discussion on "Biology book"

  1. chris els says:

    I think that both common and different skill sets are involved in the writing of non-fiction and fiction.

    The common skills regards the technical aspects, like a good command of written language, grammar and spelling, format, etc.

    Non-fiction, in my opinion, would demand attention to detail, veracity and a deep knowledge of your subject matter.

    Fiction, and here I refer to good fiction, would demand not only the ability to interest the reader (be a good storyteller), but also to make every scene indispensible to the story. This makes is more difficult to add or subtract scenes later on. Clear writing necessitates a good imagination, which not everybody, including non-fiction writers, have. Characterisation is very important as well, because one has to engage the reader’s emotions to be successful with the story.

    Just my 2c,
    Regards

  2. Robert Bruce Thompson says:

    Well, if I did decide to try writing fiction, my first choice would be women’s porn.

  3. chris els says:

    When I said not everybody, including non-fiction writers, has a good imagination, I meant “including some non-fiction writers, has a good imagination.

    Sorry!

  4. Roy Harvey says:

    Well the first rule is to write what you know, so you should have no trouble with the transition.

Comments are closed.