{"id":2196,"date":"2015-02-27T08:59:25","date_gmt":"2015-02-27T12:59:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/?p=2196"},"modified":"2015-02-27T12:33:14","modified_gmt":"2015-02-27T16:33:14","slug":"friday-27-february-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/2015\/02\/27\/friday-27-february-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"Friday, 27 February 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #000099; font-family: Arial;\">07:59 &#8211;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> Well, Obama couldn&#8217;t get congress to ban AR-pattern rifles, so now he&#8217;s trying to ban ammunition for them by executive order on the basis that 5.56\/.223 ball ammunition can be fired from pistols and therefore qualifies as banned &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.atf.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/assets\/Library\/Notices\/atf_framework_for_determining_whether_certain_projectiles_are_primarily_intended_for_sporting_purposes.pdf\">armor piercing<\/a>&#8221; pistol ammunition. The issue is that while nearly any rifle-caliber round can penetrate the soft body armor used by cops, very few pistol-caliber rounds can do so. Obama&#8217;s position is that since there are pistols that can fire 5.56\/.223 rounds, that ammunition can be banned. And there are in fact pistols that can fire that round. In the late 60&#8217;s, I fired a Remington XP-100 bolt-action single-shot pistol that was later available in 5.56\/.223, and in the early 70&#8217;s I shot .223 in a break-action single-shot Thompson-Center Contender. So what? Both of those pistols and others like them are clearly 100% sporting pistols. I&#8217;d be willing to bet that no cop has ever been shot with any of them. By Obama&#8217;s definition, almost every sporting rifle caliber can be banned because nearly all of them short of elephant-gun rounds are available in one or another pistol model. Anyway, the 2nd Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear armor-piercing pistol bullets, or indeed any other weapon.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\">Work on the prepping book continues. I&#8217;m still working in section I (the first month), on chapter I-9 on security and defense.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<hr style=\"width: 65%; height: 3px; font-family: Arial;\" \/>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #000099; font-family: Arial;\">11:33 &#8211;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> Amazon really understands customer service. On December 18th, I ordered <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/B00CWN8IK2\">this humidifier<\/a>, mainly because Consumer Reports recommended it highly. It had about a thousand customer reviews on Amazon, about half of which were five-star. What concerned me was that about a quarter of the reviews were one-star, and most of them mentioned that it had died after a few days&#8217; to a few months use. Those one-star reviews worried me, but for $30 I decided to take a chance. That&#8217;s about what it costs to replace the filter set in our large roll-around humidifier, so I figured if this little one lasted an entire season it&#8217;d be worth it.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\">It worked great until Wednesday evening, when it died after only a couple months&#8217; use. Yesterday, I went to the order page on Amazon for this item and clicked the icon to return it. Amazon asked if I wanted a refund or a replacement. I told them I wanted a refund, which they issued immediately to my credit card. The next page gave me return options, all of them free. I could print a label and drop the box off at a UPS store, print a different label and UPS would come and pick it up at my house, or return it myself and be issued an $8.24 credit for return shipping. I chose UPS picking it up from my house and clicked on the Print Label icon. As it turns out, I don&#8217;t even have to print a label. UPS will come to pick up the box in the next few days, and they&#8217;ll have the label with them. Other companies should take lessons from Amazon to learn how to do customer service right.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>07:59 &#8211; Well, Obama couldn&#8217;t get congress to ban AR-pattern rifles, so now he&#8217;s trying to ban ammunition for them by executive order on the basis that 5.56\/.223 ball ammunition can be fired from pistols and therefore qualifies as banned &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.atf.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/assets\/Library\/Notices\/atf_framework_for_determining_whether_certain_projectiles_are_primarily_intended_for_sporting_purposes.pdf\">armor piercing<\/a>&#8221; pistol ammunition. The issue is that while nearly any rifle-caliber round can penetrate the soft body armor used by cops, very few pistol-caliber rounds can do so. Obama&#8217;s position is that since there are pistols that can fire 5.56\/.223 rounds,<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/2015\/02\/27\/friday-27-february-2015\/\">&nbsp;&raquo;&nbsp;Read more about: Friday, 27 February 2015 &nbsp;&raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,44,40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-2","category-prepping","category-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}