{"id":1931,"date":"2014-08-20T08:37:11","date_gmt":"2014-08-20T12:37:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/?p=1931"},"modified":"2014-08-20T15:21:32","modified_gmt":"2014-08-20T19:21:32","slug":"wednesday-20-august-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/2014\/08\/20\/wednesday-20-august-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Wednesday, 20 August 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #000099; font-family: Arial;\">08:30 &#8211;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> As of this morning, we&#8217;re down to only 14 chemistry kits and four biology kits in stock. At recent run rates, that&#8217;s maybe a two- or three-day supply, so I&#8217;m building more kits today, starting with a batch of 30 biology kits.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<hr style=\"width: 65%; height: 3px; font-family: Arial;\" \/>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #000099; font-family: Arial;\">15:15 &#8211;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> As always at this time of year, I start thinking about how we could do things more efficiently. I was particularly thinking about that as I was building 30 boxes for biology kits. I use a total of 22 strips of tape to seal a box. To begin with, I invert the box and seal the bottom with four short strips of tape along each short side seam, one strip of tape along the long middle seam, and a long strip of tape across the short dimension in the middle of the box. That&#8217;s ten strips so far. I then seal the glued side seam with two more short strips, for a total so far of 12 strips. When I seal the box for shipping, I tape up the top of the box the same way I taped the bottom, ten more strips, for a total of 22 strips of tape per box. No wonder I go through a metric boatload of packing tape.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\">So I started wondering if I could substitute spray adhesive for the tape. I turns out that I could, but doing so would be extremely expensive and probably no faster than taping. So I started reading up on proper packing methods. It seems that the standard packing method is the two-strip method: one strip down the long seams on the top and bottom of the box, and nothing else. The alternative&#8211;recommended by USPS, UPS, and FedEx&#8211;is the so-called 6-strip or H-method. The long middle seams on the top and bottom of the box still get one long strip each, that runs 2&#8243; to 3&#8243; down the side of the box. Then each short side seam gets one strip laid down parallel to the seam and folded over the side. Four more strips, for a total of six. I just now shipped my first kit using the H-method on the top of the box. It still makes me nervous, but the people who should know say it&#8217;s very secure even using 2&#8243; rather than 3&#8243; packing tape. We&#8217;ll see. In my own defense, the boxes I receive from vendors are usually taped more like my former practice. On particularly large\/heavy\/dense boxes, I swear sometimes they must use most of a roll of tape to seal that one box. Packing tape is cheap; returns and damaged shipments are expensive in more ways than one. But the labor to apply 20+ strips of tape versus only six is also a factor. My engineering nature tells me I should try taping up sample boxes with both methods and then test them to destruction to see how much difference, if any, there really is.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>08:30 &#8211; As of this morning, we&#8217;re down to only 14 chemistry kits and four biology kits in stock. At recent run rates, that&#8217;s maybe a two- or three-day supply, so I&#8217;m building more kits today, starting with a batch of 30 biology kits.\n<\/p>\n<p>15:15 &#8211; As always at this time of year, I start thinking about how we could do things more efficiently. I was particularly thinking about that as I was building 30 boxes for biology kits.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/2014\/08\/20\/wednesday-20-august-2014\/\">&nbsp;&raquo;&nbsp;Read more about: Wednesday, 20 August 2014 &nbsp;&raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science-kits"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ttgnet.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}